Bangladeshi Nobel Peace Laureate (
Nobel Peace Prize: 2006), banker and economist Dr.
Muhammad Yunus proposed for Save Bangladeshi Garments industry to it’s Government
, Civilian, Owner of garments factories and also to foreign buyers after
Savar Tragedy (See some pictures of Savar tragedy).
At this tragedy, the death toll reached more than 850 and still dead bodies
coming out endlessly. In this situation, I think the proposal of Yunus should
accept by all of us to save our garments sector, to ensure our economical growth. So that I want to spread his proposal and share with you..
His proposal is as follows:
 |
| First Bangladeshi Nobel Peace Prize-2006 recipient - Dr Muhammad Yunus |
Savar tragedy, garments industry and Bangladesh
1.0 Savar tragedy is a symbol of our failure as a nation.
The crack in Rana Plaza that caused the collapse of the building has only shown
us that if we don’t face up to the cracks in our state systems, that we as a
nation will get lost in the debris of the collapse.
Today the souls of those who lost their lives in Rana Plaza
are watching what we are doing and listening to what we say. The last breath of
those souls surrounds us.
Did we learn anything at all from this terrible massacre? Or
will we have completed our duty by merely expressing our deep sympathy?
2.0 What should we do?
(a) Do everything to prevent such an incident from being
repeat the future.
(b) What to do for those who have lost lives, their limbs or
their livelihoods?
(c) What do we need to do to not only save our garments
industry but make it even more strong?
(d) The collapse of the nine-floor building in Savar was not
merely a collapse. The collapse of the building is just a precursor to the
imminent collapse of all our state institutions. If we look closely at the
collapse of the Savar building, we can read the symptoms of collapse of our
state institutions. We will have to find ways to fix the institutions to
protect them from complete collapse.
Citizen's Action Group
3.0 I will discuss how we might be able to not just save,
but also strengthen our garments industry.
(i) Questions have been raised about the future of the
garments industry. A very large foreign buyer has decided to pull out of
Bangladesh because of the dangers of the garments industry here. Others may
follow this example. If this happens, it will severely damage our social and
economic future. This industry does not only increase our national income but
has brought immense change in our society by transforming the lives of women in
the country.
We cannot allow this industry to be destroyed. Rather, we
have to be united as a nation to strengthen the industry.
The government, the leaders of the garments industry, the
NGOs, the civil society all have to come forward in a united way to do this.
We have to give complete reassurance to the foreign buyers
that they will never again face this kind of danger, and that we are all united
to take steps in order to achieve that, and will firmly carry out this
commitment in the future.
(ii) Each of these actors (government, owners, civil society
etc) will work jointly but also work independently within their own spheres.
Civil society will have to undertake programs in their own way. Civil society
can try to bring hope and trust in the minds of the foreign buyers on behalf of
the country. They can immediately send jointly signed letters to the chairmen
of the foreign companies as well as to the CEOs of those companies. The message
will be to highlight the social and economic importance of the garments
industry in Bangladesh, and to thank them for the role they have played in the
empowerment of women and in bringing widespread transformation to Bangladesh.
To inform them that civil society is ready to work together with the government
as well as separately to solve the problems being faced by the industry, to let
them know about the types of programs that are being considered, to express
interest in meeting with the companies to discuss about these programs, to let
them know about the formation, structure and work of a Citizen’s Action Group
for Protecting Garment Workers and Garment Industry (or something similar )
that could take quick decisions etc in support of these.
(iii) Another letter will go to the foreign organizations,
international NGOs, and consulting firms that already work to improve the
quality of the garment industries in the third world including on the issue of
workers’ rights, monitoring and screening, and so on. This letter will let them
know that the Citizen’s Action Group would like to work with them and also
cooperate with them to improve the conditions of the workers. The letter will
express the Group’s interest in meeting and remaining connected with them.
(iv) Write letters to various government agencies in the
countries of the foreign buyers to inform them that the Citizens Action Group
is determined to bring widespread change in the garments industry in
Bangladesh.
(v) Within the country, write letters to the government,
garments owners, BGMEA, BKMEA, labour organizations, NGOs, buying houses, and
other affiliated organizations and to meet with them to elaborate out the
working procedures with them.
My two proposals regarding workers
I have from time to time given recommendations to foreign
buyers about how to tackle the problems faced by the garments industry in
Bangladesh. Under the present circumstances I find it all the more important
that I raise this issue now again, particularly because of the castigation by
Pope Francis that buyers are treating the garment workers like slave labourers
with $ 40 wage per month.
My first proposal is as follows:
(a) A minimum wage law for the labor already exists in our
country. If any company pays a salary below that minimum wage, that will be
illegal.
My proposal is that the foreign buyers will jointly fix a
minimum international wage level. For example, if the minimum wage is now 25
cents per hour in Bangladesh, then they will standardize minimum wage for
garment industry as 50 cents per hour. No buyer will give any salary below this
rate, and no industry owners will fix salary below this limit. It would be an
integral part of compliance.
Of course, we have to be prepared for a negative market
reaction to this. As a result of this, some will argue that Bangladesh may overnight
lose the competitiveness it had gained for being a country offering “the
cheapest labour”. In order to retain its competitiveness, Bangladesh will have
to increase its attractiveness in other ways for example, increasing labour
productivity, increasing specialized labour skills, regain the trust of buying
companies, give assurance that no unfavourable situations will be created in
future, and to ensure the complete welfare of the workers, and so on. Until we
are able to ensure this international minimum wage, we would not be able to
pull out the workers from the grievous category of “slave labour” which was
used by the Pope.
We have to gain support for the international minimum wage
through sincere discussions with the politicians, business leaders, citizens,
church groups, and media leaders in the countries of the foreign buyers. In the
past, I have tried to convince the buyers, but have not yet succeeded. Now
after Savar Tragedy, and in light of the castigation from the Pope, the issue
has gained a new dimension. I want to mobilize my international and Bangladeshi
friends to make my efforts stronger and more persistent this time.
We have to make the international business houses understand
that while the garment workers are physically working in Bangladesh, they are
actually contributing their labour for their businesses. They are stakeholders
of their businesses. Their business depends on the labour here. Mere physical
separation should not be a ground for them to look away from the well- being of
this labour. That is the main message from the Pope. I hope the buying
companies get the point.
It is not necessary for all the companies to agree on the
minimum international wage at the same point in time. If some of the leading
companies come forward on this issue, I think the process will start. Others
will soon accept this.
(b) I have made my second proposal many times before, but it
did not gain any traction. There is now an opportunity for me to propose it
again. This time I see a good chance for its adoption because of the relevance
of the proposal to the current situation.
Bangladesh garment factory produces and sells a piece of
garment for five dollars which is attractively packed and shipped to New York
port. This five dollars not only includes the production, packaging, shipment,
profit and management but also indirectly covers the share that went to the
cotton producing farmers, yarn mills for producing the yarn, cost of dying, and
weaving as input cost.
When an American customer buys this item from a shop for US$
35, he feels happy that he got a good bargain. The point to notice is that
everyone who was involved in production collectively received US$ 5. Another
US$ 30 was added within the US for reaching the product to the final consumer.
I keep drawing attention to the fact that with a little effort we can achieve a
huge impact in the lives of those "slave labour", as the Pope calls
them. My proposal relates to the little effort. I am asking the question
whether a consumer in a shopping mall would feel upset if he is asked to pay
US$ 35.50 instead of US$ 35 for the item of clothing. My answer is: no, he’ll
not even notice this little change. If we could create a "Grameen (or
BRAC) Garment Workers Welfare Trust" in Bangladesh with that additional
US$ 0.50, then we could resolve most of the problems faced by the workers –
their physical safety, social safety, individual safety, work environment,
pensions, healthcare, housing, their children’s health, education, childcare,
retirement, old age, travel could all be taken care of through this Trust.
What do we need to do for this?
The international buying company will pay 10% of the amount
that it has agreed to pay garments factory owner (based on their negotiated
price for the garments produced) against a particular order, to the Trust. This
money will be managed, solely for the welfare of the workers in that particular
factory.
There will be separate sub-funds in the Trust for each and
every factory so that the workers in each factory are benefited on the basis of
their own production if the buyers are putting this 10% in the trust.
Bangladesh annually now exports garments worth US$ 18
billion. If all the garment buyers accept this proposal, then US$ 1.8 billion
would be received by the Trust each year. This would mean that an amount of
$500 would be deposited in the Trust for each of the 3.6 million workers. If
this amount of fund can be collected, the situation of the workers can be
vastly improved. All we have to do is to sell the item of clothing for $35.50
instead of $35. Small unnoticeable addition to the price can do workers.
Of course international buyers may argue that that extra 50
cents charged in the final price will reduce the demand for the product and
that their profit would shrink. My answer to that will be that we will offer
them an arrangement whereby their sales will go up, instead of down. We would
give them a good marketing tool to make this product more attractive to the
buyers by making the consumers feel they are getting more for this extra 50
cents. We would put a special tag on each piece of clothing to make them
"special". The tag would say: "From the Happy Workers of
Bangladesh, with Pleasure. Workers Well-being is managed by Grameen or BRAC or
any other internationally reputed organization. There would be a beautiful logo
that would go with it. This would immediately convey the message that the dress
has been made with a lot of warmth and happiness by the factory workers in
Bangladesh.
When consumers will see that a well known and trusted
institution has taken responsibility to ensure both the present and the future
of the workers who produced their garment, they won’t mind paying 50 cents
extra. The retailers may use in their advertising that these products are made
by well protected well supported workers. Consumers would be proud to support
the product and the company, rather than feel guilty about wearing a product
made by "slave labour" under harsh working conditions. A consumer will
be able to know from the company’s website and annual report, what benefits the
dress she wears are currently bringing to the workers, and what benefits their
children are receiving.
Both the national and the international businesses should
feel as though the workers are a part of their family. The days of slave labour
have to come to an end. It is better to start the process now, before more ugly
incidents occur.
I do not expect that all companies will immediately
implement my proposal. I hope that a few would come forward to experiment with
the proposal. Their country’s governments, the agencies, organizations who work
to protect labor rights, citizens groups, church groups, media, will step
forward to support it. This issue will attract attention more urgently now in
light of the mass death in Savar, as well as for the Pope’s comments on the
treatment of the poor labour in garment industry in Bangladesh.
I believe, for buying companies leaving Bangladesh is
definitely not a solution. It would be as unfortunate for Bangladesh as it
would be for the foreign buyers. There is no sense of relief for them in
leaving a country which has been highly benefitted through their business, a
country which could have gained continuing rapid and visible economic and
social progress because of them, a country that would always remain grateful to
them for their business.
Rather, if Bangladesh government and citizens could come
forward unitedly to work to remove all the difficulties being faced by the
foreign buyers, and work shoulder to shoulder with them, it would bring the joy
for creating a new breed of business that prides in achieving something which
is far beyond the business success - something which leads to a bright new
future for a country. I believe that they would rather like to remain in
Bangladesh, take challenges and take pride in creating a new society and a new
economy. Not only Disney, which left the country because of recent problems,
will come back when they see big changes are happening because of the
collective efforts of the government and the citizens, more new companies
will be interested in coming to Bangladesh. Changes are taking place in the
world of business. Even if they are tiny changes, they are coming nonetheless.
We can accelerate that change. Citizen Action Group can prepare the ground for
that.
Savar related Programs
Citizens’ Action Group can create a complete data-base of
all those who have lost their lives in Savar, lost their limbs or have had
their livelihoods affected, and work to regularly update that. The primary work
of this has already been initiated by the Grameen organizations with the help
of different other organizations. Citizen’s Action Group can take the
responsibility to coordinate this work.
Many programs have been announced and a lot of funds have
been pledged for those who have been affected, and this is still ongoing. The
Citizens’ Action Group can advise on these programs and how best to implement
them. It can monitor the programs and inform the relevant authorities
accordingly. They can keep contact with the victims on an individual basis, and
help them solve their problems by establishing links between them and the
appropriate agencies. The problems that are being faced by the victims of Savar
range from the immediate to the long term. The Citizens’ Action Group should be
ready to keep the people of the country remain engaged with the rehabilitation
of the victims, and come up with effective programs to tackle the problems of
different kinds (health, income, education etc.) and of different duration,
faced by the victims of Savar.
When will we come to our senses?
Savar has created a huge wound and deep pain in the minds of
the people of country. I pray that this deep pain compels us towards resolving
the core of the problems in our national life. Savar is the creation of our
dysfunctional politics. When we watched more than 600 helpless deaths, the loss
of limbs of hundreds on our TV screen throughout the country it made us aware
at every moment, what our dysfunctional politics has led us to.
After all this, will we just keep on watching as it keeps
happening again and again?
When will we come to our senses?
.JPG)
.JPG)
